Network investment
Unwired Insight advises mobile network operators and their investors on the characteristics of emerging wireless technologies and the implications of alternative mobile network investments. We evaluate different network strategies and develop business cases for alternative approaches. Here we present a selection of free analysis on the investment choices of mobile network operators around the world and the implications of novel approaches such as network sharing.
For more information on our work or to enquire about our services, please email us at contact@unwiredinsight.com or telephone +44 (0) 1480 819391.
USA pulls ahead of Europe with LTE
It doesn’t seem long ago that I remember looking across the Atlantic with pride as Europe forged ahead with the deployment of GSM systems, while the USA struggled to keep up with a disparate array of mobile network standards. Not anymore. Last week T-Mobile became the last of the four US national mobile operators to announce its intention to launch LTE services in 2013, while the plans for many European network operators remain unclear.
We have commented previously on the early launch of LTE services in the USA and indeed the plans of both AT&T Mobility and Sprint Nextel to launch LTE-Advanced services in the USA in 2013.
In January 2012, Sprint stated its intention to launch LTE in Dallas, Atlanta, Houston and San Antonio in the first half of 2012.
Now T-Mobile has announced the launch of LTE services in 2013, as part of a USD4billion network modernisation programme. Part of the plan is to refarm existing HSPA+ services to 1900MHz, which has previously been used only to support GSM. This releases the 1700MHz band for LTE and has the added benefit that T-Mobile will then be in a position to support the Apple iPhone with HSPA+ services. Currently T-Mobile is the only one of the big four US operators that is unable to support the iPhone, because its HSPA+ services operate in unsupported bands. With rumours that the imminent iPad3 will support LTE, there was a danger of T-Mobile being seriously left behind by its competitors.
As the USA presses ahead with LTE, the gap between the USA and Europe appears to be widening. France, Italy, Spain and the UK are all currently without LTE networks. The UK doesn’t even have a firm date for the auction of new spectrum for LTE, let alone network operator plans to deploy commercial LTE services. As LTE networks and devices become increasingly prevalent around the world, countries and individual network operators without it are going to look increasingly like the poor relations.
UK spectrum auction will shape mobile industry for many years to come
The forthcoming auction of 800MHz and 2.6GHz spectrum, and the associated licence conditions, will have a profound impact on the mobile industry in the UK. In its latest consultation and proposals, Ofcom highlights that the auction is “likely to be the last significant opportunity to obtain prime mobile spectrum for many years” and that the distribution of spectrum after the auction “is therefore likely to shape the competitiveness of the mobile sector for at least the next decade”.
It is crucial that the auction process leads to the cultivation of top quality coverage, high speed data and service innovation. The last major auction of mobile spectrum in the UK, held in 2000, failed to provide these and it could be argued that the UK networks have done little more than tread water for the last ten years. As we have commented previously, 3G coverage is, even now, much worse than 2G coverage.
Ofcom is of the view that the UK needs at least four “credible national wholesalers”, by which it means four network operators with spectrum portfolios that are strong enough to offer competitive services nationally, with regard to capacity, quality of coverage, peak data rates (immediately after the auction) and availability of LTE (immediately after the auction).
Ofcom is of the view that this level of competition is essential to achieve low prices, high quality coverage and innovation of services. However, experience of 3G shows that, while competition can help to reduce prices, it does not necessarily enhance coverage (particularly in rural areas) or increase innovation. It is striking how similar all of the UK operators are, in terms of their pricing and services, and I have lost count of the number of overseas visitors who have expressed their surprise at the limited coverage and quality of the UK networks, compared with other markets.
So how do we ensure that these important points are addressed this time, given that competition alone is not enough? Ofcom is still evaluating the options, but it is good to see that at least some aspects are being addressed. In his recent post, Mark Heath has already talked about the positive introduction of demanding coverage targets, for at least one of the licences. However, another important issue is the cultivation of new ideas and service innovation. One of the problems with relying on the established industry players is that they will tend to do things the way they have always done them.
Ofcom already anticipates that three of the “credible national wholesalers” will be Everything Everywhere, Telefónica O2 and Vodafone. It is good that Ofcom intends to reserve spectrum to ensure that a fourth player (either H3G or a new entrant) has a strong enough portfolio to compete with these long-established players. However, personally I would like to see some new blood in the industry, to inject some new ideas and different approaches.
Over ten years ago, during the preparation for the 3G spectrum auction, I worked closely with the SpectrumCo consortium, led by Virgin. The consortium worked with telecom experts and a wide variety of major retail brands to develop a number of radical new ideas, including:
- a wholesale operator with a number of strongly branded MVNOs
- ambitious roll out plans to provide high-quality coverage as soon as possible
- an exciting vision for the future of terminals and the mobile Internet.
As it turned out, the high cost of the licences deterred many new entrants, including SpectrumCo, during the bidding process, so we ended up with the existing players plus H3G, all of which paid huge sums. H3G focused primarily on pricing innovation (e.g. bigger bundles) rather than innovation in services or business model.
In retrospect, the technology of the day may not have been ready for some of the exciting ideas and service concepts promoted by Virgin and its partners. However, ten years on, the pieces of the jigsaw are coming into place and the availability of high speed data and advanced smartphones could now make these visionary ideas a reality. Early 3G technology was unable to deliver high data rates, but LTE is fully able to do so, especially when bolstered by microcells, femtocells, WiFi and smart antennas. Also, we anticipate that exciting new mobile devices, such as the forthcoming iPad 3 and iPhone 5, will support LTE. Furthermore, although there is a substantial amount of new spectrum on offer, the economic environment is such that the cost of the licences may be substantially lower than 3G.
Hopefully this exciting opportunity will encourage new players to enter the UK mobile market, either on their own or perhaps in partnership with H3G. It would be good to see some of the ideas of ten years ago finally come to fruition.
Good 3G news and bad 4G news for the UK mobile industry
There have been two interesting developments in the UK mobile industry this month – one definitely good news for the industry and its consumers, and one distinctly bad.
Firstly, the good news! We have devoted quite a bit of attention in this blog to the poor state of 3G coverage in the UK. While having a relatively large number of mobile network operators has helped to lower mobile pricing, it has totally failed to encourage the deployment of widespread 3G coverage, particularly in areas outside major towns and cities. Having a large number of mobile network operators has resulted in all operators competing for customers in the same areas with high population density, and avoiding rural areas. It has also resulted in an unnecessarily large number of ‘duplicate’ base stations in urban areas where many residents do not want to see ugly base station masts.
At the Conservative Party Conference this month, the Chancellor, George Osborne, announced a UK government investment of £150 million to improve mobile coverage across the UK. Perhaps unsurprisingly, he did not acknowledge that this funding was necessary due to the failure of previous Government policy or Ofcom in ensuring that mobile network operators were required to deliver extensive coverage as part of W-CDMA spectrum licence conditions (or, at the very least, that they were actually financially motivated to provide such coverage). Putting aside the reasons for the current poor state of mobile coverage, at least action is now being taken to address one of the biggest issues among mobile broadband customers.
Working with Ofcom, the UK Government aims to extend mobile coverage to 99% of the UK population. In consultation with local communities, new mobile base station masts will be installed, to improve coverage for 6 million people. We look forward to hearing more of the details in due course as they become available.
Now the bad news. As we have previously reported, the licencing of 800MHz and 2.6GHz spectrum for next-generation services (i.e. LTE) has been dogged by constant delays.
In March 2011, I reported that Ofcom intended to hold the auction for 800MHz and 2.6GHz spectrum in the first half of 2012, which would mean that the UK would be well behind other countries in the launch of LTE services, including Germany, the USA and Japan. Frustratingly, Ofcom has further delayed the auction, stating that “perhaps” the auction would now commence in the fourth quarter of 2012. Ofcom has attributed this latest delay to a number of “substantial and strongly argued responses” to its recent consultation. After so many delays, one begins to wonder whether the spectrum auction will even take place by 2013.
So, the outlook for the UK mobile industry is that it will be a laggard with next-generation mobile networks, albeit with the coverage of 3G networks improved with a relatively modest £150 million investment. We will continue to analyse the global leaders in LTE. It’s just a shame that the UK will be not among them for quite some time.
About the author:
Mark Heath, of telecom consultancy company Unwired Insight, provides in-depth telecom analysis of global mobile markets. Mark has authored more than 40 reports on key issues in the wireless telecommunications industry.